The Malawian general public has been invited by the Environmental Affairs Department (Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Management) to provide feedback on the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) carried out by RPS Group on Surestream Petroleum‘s proposed surveying for the exploration of oil in Lake Malawi. Last week, public hearings were held in Karonga, Rumphi, Mzuzu and Nkhatabay. This week they are being held in Lilongwe, Nkhotakota and Blantyre.
At each of the public hearings, the Environmental Affairs Department (Juwo Sibande) has presented on the purpose of public hearings within the Environmental Impact Assessment process as defined within Malawi’s 1996 Environment Management Act. Following Sibande’s presentation, the RPS Group has provided an overview of the ESIA (led by head of the ESIA team Stuart Sharp), which is helpful as the ESIA is close to 500 pages. Following the presentations, the participants have had an opportunity to address questions to the government, ESIA consultants and Surestream Petroleum. Keith Robinson, General Manager of Surestream Petroleum, has been present at each of the public hearings.
Public hearings on environmental (social) impact assessments are a legal requirement stipulated in Malawi’s Environment Management Act (EMA) (1996). The ESIA was submitted by RPS Group in December 2012. The ESIA is being reviewed by the Technical Committee on the Environment (Section 16, EMA) and the ongoing public hearings will contribute to this review process.
According to the Director of the Environmental Affairs Department Aloysius Kamperewera, public hearings help the Government of Malawi to “gather more information, more ideas on the proposed project and how it might impact on people and the environment”. Following these consultations, the amended ESIA will be submitted to the National Council on the Environment (Section 10, EMA), which is responsible for making a final recommendation to the Minister.
Drilling Lake Malawi for oil will take a long time, possibly between 15 and 30 years (see the handouts below). At each of the public hearings, the Government of Malawi, the RPS Group and Surestream Petroleum have emphasised that there is “no drilling at this stage”. The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), which is available online, refers only to the initial stage in oil exploration – the aeromagnetic survey, the full tensor gravity survey and 2D seismic survey, which may also lead to a lake bottom survey.
Once (or if) this ESIA has been approved, Surestream Petroleum will be allowed to proceed with the aforementioned surveying activities. If the results of the survey are promising, Surestream Petroleum would require another ESIA for exploratory oil drilling. To produce oil after successful results from the surveying and exploratory drilling, a company would need to apply for and be awarded a production licence (as outlined in Malawi’s Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Act (1983)) and require another ESIA before being given the green light.
The public hearings
At public hearings in Karonga and Rumphi last week, participants asked the government to put in place appropriate petroleum legislation so that Malawians benefit. The Nation reported that Bishop Matthew Mtumbuka of the Karonga Catholic Diocese asserted
We cannot keep on pretending that things are well in Malawi. Our people are poor and suffering. We need these resources to ensure that we uplift lives of Malawians, but we need to do this in the confines of the law.
In Mzuzu on Wednesday 22 January 2014, the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace (CCJP) and the Church of the Central African Presbyterian (CCAP) Livingstonia Synod warned the government about awarding licences under outdated laws; the Petroleum Exploration and Production Act came into effect in 1983. Ministry of Mining’s Peter Chilumanga responded that the country should not turn away investors even if the laws need revision. He pointed out that the first step is to address this situation is by developing a Petroleum Exploration and Production Policy to guide amendments to the 1983 Act.
In addition, Capital FM reported on 22 January 2014 that Paramount Chief Kyungu of Karonga spoke out against extraction of oil from Lake Malawi.
Kyungu told a public hearing organized by the Surestream Petroleum Malawi that the development is unwelcome in the district.
According to the paramount chief, there may be few qualified marine experts in Malawi to conduct the oil drilling activity without causing harm to both people and other living things such as fish.
He cited the oil spillage that occurred in the United States a few years ago, saying such a country with a big economy took some time to rectify the problem.
He says if the same development happens to Malawi it would be disaster.
During the public hearing held in Lilongwe (28 January 2014, see photos here), discussion focussed on compensation of people (particularly those relying on fishing) who would be affected by the surveying activities, the absence of many civil society organisations at this public hearing in Lilongwe, and the displacement of fish as a result of surveying. To date, research on the impact of proposed surveying methods has not been conducted in a fresh water environment.
Three members of the general public pressed the government about the ongoing dispute with Tanzania over the lake boundaries.
The issue of the border should be something that should be treated with more depth. There was a very detailed presentation of the villagers’ livelihoods on the Malawi side but there was silence on the Tanzania side.
The government highlighted that the public hearing was not the appropriate place to discuss the border dispute since the hearings are organised by the Environmental Affairs Department, which does not take a “political angle”. Nonetheless, it is clear that the outcome of the dispute will have implications for which country manages the Lake and its resources. Another participant exclaimed
We [Malawians] are the owners and we are not supposed to be given a portion but they are supposed to get a portion from us.
Surestream Petroleum General Manager Keith Robinson described the company’s social contributions to date.
Surestream Petroleum started their involvement in Malawi two years ago. As you can see, we are still at a very early stage in the whole process which can take very many years. We are going through the process of getting to the point where we get all the permissions in line, all the considerations in line, and all the correct approvals and considerations and at some point we will begin activiteis on the lake. We have not waited to that point to start our contributions.
Our single largest project has been the Surestream Football Academy. We have identified talent, and even us in our wildest expectations could not have imagined what we have seen.
What those activities are will depend on consultations, depend on direction from governmental sources, DCs [District Commissioners], civil society. This is a long, long process. We have shown commitment from the start and we will continue to do so in all our social activities.
Some Malawian citizens may not be as convinced. Last week, www.lakegate.com was launched by a group of “concerned Malawians” who have been recruiting people to sign up to two petitions (here and here) to stop oil drilling in Lake Malawi.
TAKE ACTION: 1696 signed so far http://t.co/vlVgSpTbAz @Change @KYCichlids @Oceana @DerekWatts #petition #share #retweet #lakemalawi #lp
— Lakegate (@lakegate) January 28, 2014
Peter Chimulanga, Deputy Director of Mines, addressed such concerned citizens directly,
Government is in the process of developing how we should manage the resources so that there is mutual benefit from the investors’ point of view and government. We are in the process of developing a Petroleum and Exploration Management Policy. Within whose confines the licence has been awarded to Surestream. We will go on to revise the Act. […]
We will ensure we will adopt the best practices used worldwide, so that nobody should be complaining that “we did not benefit” neither should the investor complain. There is a difference between solid and liquid minerals. E.g. we are now looking at the process of exploring, there is investment going in, when we come to the next stage, assuming that in place x there is potential for oil exploration, the company will conduct a drilling exploratory process. That alone is quite expensive (over 800 million USD) just to sink one exploration drilling well. We are talking of quite substantial investment from an investor. Then we need to understand how we can best share in light of the investment that has been done by the investor and in light of the fact that the resource belongs to Malawi. […]
It’s a balancing act that we are trying to follow by using the best approach, the best practice world wide. We should be bearing that in mind when we are talking about sharing [resources]. So that there is no complaint from the investor or the common man who lives in Chilumba.
The public hearings were brought to a close on Wednesday 29 January 2014 in Blantyre with Robinson’s remarks that “we are intending to discover oil deposits”.
Below are two handouts distributed at the public hearings. Click on image to enlarge.
Handout: Lake Malawi Oil Exploration Program
Handout: Msonkhano wa Anthu Onse Okhudzidwa: Kufufuza za Kukhudzana kwa Zachilengedwe ndi Anthu ndi Polojekiti yofufuza Mafuta pa Nyanja (ESIA) mu Boloko 2 ndi 3
Sorry I missed the consultation. I did spend an hour or more skim reading the ESIA. Is there a mechanism for sending feedback other than at one of the public meetings?
Yes, there is. The Environmental Affairs Department is open to receiving comments until 12 February.
You could send comments to [email protected] (EAD) and [email protected] (ESIA consultant with RPS Group).
Let us know if this does not work.
Excellent summation of everything!
Reblogged this on agnesmizere.
Pingback: Listen to Public Hearing Q&A on Surestream Petroleum’s Proposed Surveying Activities of Lake Malawi for Oil | Mining in Malawi·
Iam a malawian who lives in south africa born in karonga district. Iam a prominent business man, my question is: why is the government not giving us a chance as malawians to invest in the oil on our lake? I as a malawian i want to have a block in my area in turn i will help my people. I have big reputable oil companies who want to fund me, why not giving me a chance as a son of the soil madam president? Its unfair to us seeing foreigners rooting our country while we can do it. Yes part of it you can give them but not all blocks no, i personally one need one. When i remember my life as a child, we were depending on the lake, we suffered very bad and now time has come to wipe our tears and give back to our people.
THE POLITICS OF SURESTREAM’S OIL DRILING IN LAKE MALAWI AND THE ENVIROMENT
By Chindikani Kaseka Nyirenda
(University of Livingstonia, Malawi)
Lake Malawi is an African great lake and the southernmost lake in the east African Rift valley lakes, third largest freshwater lake in Africa and eighth largest lake in the word ranging from 560km to 480km in length and estimated about 75km in width covering about 29,600 km2 with estimated volume of 8,400 km3 of water found between three countries namely Malawi, Tanzania and Mozambique. The lake supports millions of people through fisheries resources and water and tourism……….. read more here http://www.chindikanikaseka.blogspot.com/2012/06/advice-to-surestream-and-its-general.html
In conclusion basing on the findings of this document, oil drilling in Lake Malawi will pose unacceptably high environmental, economical and public health risks. The lake is Essential for human agricultural and industrial activities, river deposit alluvial soils. They provide the most productive agricultural lands to the country, most of all it also helps to develop tourism; they provide the recreation through boating and swimming. And lastly they maintain the aquatic ecosystem.
Many of these risks are inherent to the oil drilling process and, as such, cannot be mitigated by regulatory changes or management practices. As a result, it’s my recommendation to the Malawian government to permanent ban drilling oil in Lake Malawi and to then Surestream and its general manager Keith Robinson; they should stop their plans of extracting oil in Lake Malawi.
Pingback: UNESCO examines potential impact of oil exploration in Lake Malawi National Park amid unresolved border dispute | Mining in Malawi·
Pingback: Year 2014 round up: Mining reforms steal limelight – Mining Review (December 2014) | Mining in Malawi·
Pingback: One Year Has Passed Since Malawi’s Government Started Reviewing Oil Exploration Licences and Agreements | Mining in Malawi·
Pingback: Lake Malawi oil drilling: firm opts for onshore studies – Mining & Trade Review (July 2016) | Mining in Malawi·
Pingback: British Government Uses Aid Money To Back Oil Drilling In UNESCO World Heritage Site·